From: "Randy" 

I would agree, but if these are a bunch of onesy-twosies as opposed to one
or two massive  takedowns a-la organized crime (which, in my view,
terrorism fits that operational model to a degree) then all you have done
is whacked one cell, but others cells will take over.

"Mark"  wrote in message
news:42d09e0e$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> Either way, I'd rather they were off the chessboard.
>
> "Randy"  wrote in message
news:42d0995e$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> More likely, 3,000 = potentially 3 briefcase nukes, 20 Londons and 2
>> Madrids.
>>
>> Maybe. Maybe not.
>>
>> "Mark"  wrote in message
>> news:42d0600f$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>
>>> "Geo"  wrote in message
news:42d05c0c$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>> "Mark"  wrote in message
>>>> news:42d03f08$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>>> "There have been many clandestine victories
against al Qaeda. More
>>>>> than
>>>>> 3,000 al Qaeda operatives have been seized or slain in
102 countries
>>>>> since
>>>>> September 11, 2001*" -- Richard Miniter writing
in "Shadow War." (*
>>>>> that
>>>> was
>>>>> through 2003, it's many more by now).
>>>>
>>>> Yeah right, it shows. I mean what a huge difference it's made..
>>>
>>> How do we know it hasn't? Just 4 terrorists did the London deed, what if
>>> the other 3000 hadn't been captured or killed?
>>>
>>> 3000/4 = 750 more Londons.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5