Aggy wrote:
> bluesmama wrote:
> > Aggy wrote:
> >> _TR_ wrote:
> >>> bluesmama wrote:
> >>>> Or we could just deny you sex, steal your DNA and
treat you like
an
> >>>> ATM machine.
> >> Naughty. naughty, dear.
> >>>
> >>> Indeed. Such is the motivation of a feminist.
> >> No, dear. What you meant to say was;
> >> "Such is the motivation of a misandrist"
> >> Use the right words, dear or nobody will take you seriously.
> >>
> >> Aggy.
> >
> > Apparently misandrist = feminist in many minds.

Even when a statement has a _little_ content, you remove it with your
excessive use of weasel words.  You snatch meaningless writing from the
jaws of bad writing.

> > I wouldn't dare argue
> > that some - perhaps even many - feminists are misandrists. But I
would

Case rested.

> > argue that some are definitely not. Of course any woman who either
> > claims to be or demonstrates that she is a feminist is immediately

I note your cowardly use of the passive voice.  Name those whom you
accuse, you powder puff.

> > "branded" here as having nothing to say that can't be refuted
simply
> > by saying it's a "feminist" argument. Handy trick.

Nothing you've written needs refuting, because nothing you've written
has content.  Trying to refute it would be like trying to nail jello to
a wall.

> It's because these misogynists are afraid of the truth, dear.

Of what truth do you think we're afraid?  On what basis do you call us
misogynists?

Hand write your posts in crayon, on construction paper, and stick them
to the fridge with magnets.  Your writing isn't good enough for this
group.

> Aggy



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/9/05 8:08:56 PM ---