From: rfischer{at}sonic.net (Ray Fischer)

H Dickmann  wrote:
>
>"Ray Fischer"  wrote in message
>news:46036321$0$14089$742ec2ed{at}news.sonic.net...
>>H Dickmann  wrote:
>>>
>>>"MarkA"  wrote in message
>>>news:pan.2007.03.23.03.49.12.521900{at}nowhere.com...
>>>> On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:07:22 -0700, skyeyes wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 22, 7:47 am, "H Dickmann"
 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Tell me about social progress in 20 years from now
when 30% of women
>>>>>> chose never to have Children.
>>>>>
>>>>> Newsflash:  not all women want children.  Not all women *like*
>>>>> children.
>>>>> It's funny, if having children is so bloody wonderful,
why does the
>>>>> rate
>>>>> of childbirth go down whenever and wherever women have
access to higher
>>>>> education and personal choice?  Do you think women are
intended to be
>>>>> nothing but baby machines?
>>>>>
>>>>> Why do you want to force women to have children they
do not want?  Do
>>>>> you
>>>>> realize how messed up such children are?  Do you
realize that there are
>>>>> already 6.5 *billion* people on this benighted planet already?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Catholics do not believe that there is any limit to how
many people the
>>>> Earth can support.
>>>
>>>Not correct,
>>
>> No, it's pretty much correct
>>
>>>If you want to limit the worlds population start with poor
countries where
>>>people deliberately have a dozen children so they have someone to support
>>>them in sickness and old age.
>>
>> The Catholic church is opposed to limiting the number of children.
>
>Must be the reason why they promote natural family planning.

1) They don't promote it - they allow it. 2) It's two main attributes are
that it prevents people from having too much sex and it doesn't work all
that well.

--
Ray Fischer
rfischer{at}sonic.net

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag