From: "Tony Ingenoso" 

Existing standards seem to show 5X-10X difference between allowable
exposure (inhalation/food/water, etc) levels between DU and enriched
uranium.

i.e. they are quite clearly NOT the same thing WRT being a public hazzard.


"Don Hills"  wrote in message
news:KLI0CtgaXuvD092yn{at}attglobal.net...
> In article , "Tony Ingenoso"

wrote:
> >Toxicity != radioactivity.
>
> Sorry. I meant radioactivity. My point was, regardless of whether the dust
> comes from "enriched" uranium or depleted uranium, breathing
or eating it
is
> a very bad idea.
>
> --
> Don Hills    (dmhills at attglobaldotnet)     Wellington, New Zealand
> "New interface closely resembles Presentation Manager,
>  preparing you for the wonders of OS/2!"
>     -- Microsoft advertisement on the box for Windows 2.11 for 286

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5