-=> Quoting Paul Andinach to Michael Holt <=-
 MH> I'd like to suggest that the eye on the classic grey is NOT an eye as
 MH> we know it.  And that the shape of the grey is not one which reflects
 MH> the shape of the controlling intelligence in abduction situations.
 PA> Three options present themselves:
 PA> 1. They're not eyes as we know them, so the rest of the conclusions
 PA> don't follow. 
 
Do we have any way of knowing what those places are if they are not
eyes?
 PA> 2. The rest of the conclusions do follow, and the Greys are being
 PA> controlled by some other race with smaller eyes or larger heads. 
 
This was my conclusion, given that the eyes are eyes and the brain is 
therefore limited in size.  
 PA> 3. Greys don't exist. (This option, of course, can explain any
 PA> number of apparent inconsistencies.) 
That does explain things a bit....  But then we are faced with the problem
of explaining such are large-scale event.
The general difficulty I have with abductions as subjects of scientific
research is the difficulty of data collection.  Except in some peripheral
aspects of the events, we have no way of *knowing* any facts beyond any 
doubt.
Michael
... I'm cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.
--- FMail 0.98
---------------