From: "Gary Britt" 

Not at all.  Its not Rove's hair splitting that counts, unlike Clinton's
situation.  Its the statutes hairsplitting that counts.  Statutes that
create liability for something and have specific definitions apply to what
they apply and don't to what they don't.

Gary

"Steve Ewing"  wrote in message
news:op.strzjeiasagvys{at}news.barkto.com...
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:24:52 -0400, Gary Britt 
> wrote:
>
> > Like it or not it makes a BIG difference.  Its only illegal to disclose
> > THEIR NAME/IDENTITY, and only then under very specific circumstances,
not
> > applicable here.
> > Gary
>
> It all depends on what the meaning of "is" is.
>
> --
> Steve 
> http://www.qmss.com/~sewing

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5