From: "Anlatt the Builder" 

On Mar 22, 7:09 am, "John D.Wentzky"
 wrote:
> "thomas p."  wrote in message
>
> news:1174542611.921031.259270{at}l75g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 21 Mar., 18:23, "John D.Wentzky"

> > wrote:
> >> "Ray Fischer"  wrote in message
>
> >>news:46015751$0$14102$742ec2ed{at}news.sonic.net...
>
> >> > John D.Wentzky  wrote:
> >> >>"Anlatt the Builder"
 wrote in message
> >> >>>  "John D.Wentzky"

>
> >> >>>> > Courts are permitted to declare laws
unconstitutional.
>
> >> >>>> Wrong.
>
> >> >>> Courts. Are not. Permitted. To declare laws.
Unconstitutional.
>
> >> >>> You actually claim that?
>
> >> >>Yes. At least in part.
> >> >>There are rules to be adhered to.
>
> >> > Rules which you pull out of your ass.
>
> >> > The rules stated in the Constitution say that the courts
do have the
> >> > responsibility to decide whether laws are unconstitutional.
>
> >> Which would give the USSC authority to strike down roevwade.
>
> > And your point would be?  Nobody argued that they agreed with every
> > decision the court makes, only that the court has the right to
> > determine the constitutionality of laws in cases brought before it.
>
> They can only determine something to be unconstitutional if it violates the
> Constitution.

They decided, after due process, that the law violated the Constitution.
That's their job. Who should we let make the decision - you?

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag