(greg1199{at}yahoo.com) writes:
> Andre Lieven wrote:
>> "SpeedRacer" (info{at}athenamm.com) writes:
>> >>Forget what they tell you anyway.  They'll just say that they
> expect
>> >>hubby to jump through this or that hoop, but they can go pound sand
>> >>up their asses.  Preggo or not, they should treat their husbands as
>> >>they expect to be treated.
>> >
>> > Thanks Greg (+ others).
>>
>> Hi, and you're welcome. :-)
>>
>> > To tell you the truth, I did my best to remain
>> > calm and explain in very much detail what I was looking for. No
>> > matter what I did, I got slapped in the face.
>>
>> Oh, we know all about that. The whole point of view of Feminism,
>> which it's likely, based on your description of their reactions to
>> your reasonable query, they suffered from the brain rot therof, is
>> that there is simply NO other viewpoint that will be tolerated.
>
> Feminists unabashedly exercise their political power when they could
> just as well debate, or concede a point (which is not a bad thing), or
> agree to disagree, or agree that the matter needs further examination.
> Case in point: Dr. Larry Summers.  I'm sure you've heard of the flap
> over this once proud president of Harvard University, who now humbles
> himself before the goddess of PC femscism.

Oh, of course. His remarks were posted here, and read quite reasonably.

> He questioned whether there
> may be an elephant in the living room, saying that men and women may
> differ slightly in mathematical aptitude.  Of course they didn't argue
> the point, but they nearly got him fired, and may still.

Indeed, as feminists hate truth.

> As you put well, they let their brains rot when they muzzle you instead
> of debating you.  Take Nancy Hopkins, who is Summers' main inquisitor.
> She's a bio professor from MIT, yet she experienced severe nausea and
> dizziness when she heard a view she didn't like, and she ran from the
> room for fear of making a mess.  At the very least, a scientist should
> be able to hear a hypothesis and not get sick about it, especially an
> MIT biologist, but the feminist brain rot has set in.  She can't do it.

Exactly. Any " scientist " that gets queasy from hearing factual issues
discussed, should turn in her degree, and go flip some burgers.

>> > But believe me..my patience wore
>> > then and then the gloves came off. The group is misc.kids.pregnancy
>
> Ha!  Give 'em hell, Harry!!

Indeed.

>> Ah. Likely an ongoing estrogen celebration pipe of effluents.
>> Celebrating the animalistic efforts of mammals.
>>
>> > But I'm not looking to start a war of the sexes. *lol* I'm just
> looking
>> > for a little perpective from both sides. Thanks for the support.
>>
>> No problem. Our point, if I might try to say this for the posters
>> here who responded to your query, is that there are no out of bounds
>> questions, or discussions. When one side starts to shout "
misogynist ! "
>> to such a reasonable question, *its they* who display a fascist like
>> closed mind.
>
> Indeed.  A select group call themselves liberals, when they are the
> very opposite of what a liberal is, in the literal sense.

Quite. I lean to classical liberalism, not the modern MS-nomer.

> These
> so-called liberals would rather shut men up than let them speak.  This
> is like a group of pacifists who burn buildings down.  But in calling
> themselves liberal, they can partially insulate themselves from being
> called femscist thugs.  "You can't call me that.  I'm the liberal one.
> Read the pin I'm wearing.  See?"

" Measure them by what they do... "

Andre



--
" I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. "
                                    The Man Prayer, Red Green.


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/11/05 12:42:09 PM ---