Andre Lieven wrote:
> "SpeedRacer" (info{at}athenamm.com) writes:
> >>Forget what they tell you anyway.  They'll just say that they
expect
> >>hubby to jump through this or that hoop, but they can go pound sand
up
> >
> >>their asses.  Preggo or not, they should treat their husbands as
they
> >>expect to be treated.
> >
> > Thanks Greg (+ others).
>
> Hi, and you're welcome. :-)
>
> > To tell you the truth, I did my best to remain
> > calm and explain in very much detail what I was looking for. No
matter
> > what I did, I got slapped in the face.
>
> Oh, we know all about that. The whole point of view of Feminism,
> which it's likely, based on your description of their reactions to
> your reasonable query, they suffered from the brain rot therof, is
> that there is simply NO other viewpoint that will be tolerated.

Feminists unabashedly exercise their political power when they could
just as well debate, or concede a point (which is not a bad thing), or
agree to disagree, or agree that the matter needs further examination.
Case in point: Dr. Larry Summers.  I'm sure you've heard of the flap
over this once proud president of Harvard University, who now humbles
himself before the goddess of PC femscism.  He questioned whether there
may be an elephant in the living room, saying that men and women may
differ slightly in mathematical aptitude.  Of course they didn't argue
the point, but they nearly got him fired, and may still.

As you put well, they let their brains rot when they muzzle you instead
of debating you.  Take Nancy Hopkins, who is Summers' main inquisitor.
She's a bio professor from MIT, yet she experienced severe nausea and
dizziness when she heard a view she didn't like, and she ran from the
room for fear of making a mess.  At the very least, a scientist should
be able to hear a hypothesis and not get sick about it, especially an
MIT biologist, but the feminist brain rot has set in.  She can't do it.


> > But believe me..my patience wore
> > then and then the gloves came off. The group is misc.kids.pregnancy

Ha!  Give 'em hell, Harry!!

> Ah. Likely an ongoing estrogen celebration pipe of effluents.
> Celebrating the animalistic efforts of mammals.
>
> > But I'm not looking to start a war of the sexes. *lol* I'm just
looking
> > for a little perpective from both sides. Thanks for the support.
>
> No problem. Our point, if I might try to say this for the posters
> here who responded to your query, is that there are no out of bounds
> questions, or discussions. When one side starts to shout " misogynist
! "
> to such a reasonable question, *its they* who display a fascist like
> closed mind.

Indeed.  A select group call themselves liberals, when they are the
very opposite of what a liberal is, in the literal sense.  These
so-called liberals would rather shut men up than let them speak.  This
is like a group of pacifists who burn buildings down.  But in calling
themselves liberal, they can partially insulate themselves from being
called femscist thugs.  "You can't call me that.  I'm the liberal one.
Read the pin I'm wearing.  See?"



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/11/05 12:42:09 PM ---