From: Adam Flinton 

Tony Ingenoso wrote:
> I think its been well established that Saddam had the "materiels".
>

You may think so but reality points the other way.

When did the chem weapons plants spark up to replace the losses via
reaction? Where were the nuclear facilities required to enrich uranium e.g.
where are the hexafluoride gas production facilities?

> The left was whining about some 400,000lb of explosive gone missing, there
> was the uranium and many many tons of other radiological crap as well.
>

Indeed most hospital radiological departments got ransacked along with the
operating theatres etc.


> Your denial is absolutely amazing.
>

You refusal to accept reality is far more staggering.

Adam

> "Robert Comer"  wrote in message
> news:42d3a589$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>
>>>You just stated a couple of posts back that Saddam didn't have the
>>>"capability" to deliver such things, so you appear to
be taking a
>>>different
>>>stance.
>>>
>>>Which is it going to be?
>>
>>Sure, *everyone* has the capability of fedex'ing something bad to someone
>>else, but that doesn't mean they have the materials to do it, or that they
>>wouldn't get caught.
>>
>>- Bob Comer
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5