Ian wrote:
> Hyerdahl wrote:
> > Rob wrote:
> > > Grizzlie Antagonist  wrote in
> > message news:...
> >
> > > > On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 07:44:39 GMT, "MCP"
> > 
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >LOL!! So GA are you saying you agree with this?
> > > >
> > > > Oh, it has its good points :o)
> > >
> > > It does. But does it shift the problem to 36+, rather than 29? In
> her
> > > 20s her subconscious instincts are for nest and children.
> >
> > I don't see how this holds true, when young women are entering jobs
> and
> > college more and more.  It seems to me that both women and men have
a
> > natural desire to procreate, but that doesn't mean that women don't
> > have other desires that become more important to them, like school
> and
> > work.
> >
>
> Please read survey after survey after survey. Do your own even.
>
> I'm fully behind women who want to work outside the home, but you are
> against women who want to work inside it, and you're supposed to be
the
> feminist.
>
> I also fully support the one percent of women who can understand
maths
> beyond the derivation of the quadratic equation, who wish to become
> scientists, but I don't see why all men should be taxed to give the
> other 99% the chance, when that money could be spent on defence,
> healthcare, or schools.
>
> Do you have any idea how ridiculous you sound Parg, being a feminist
> openly acknowledging your denial of women's choice to be a mother?

Why are you purposely misrepresenting what she said?

Kate



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/11/05 8:42:29 PM ---