Hyerdahl wrote:
> Rob wrote:
> > Grizzlie Antagonist  wrote in
> message news:...
>
> > > On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 07:44:39 GMT, "MCP"
> 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >LOL!! So GA are you saying you agree with this?
> > >
> > > Oh, it has its good points :o)
> >
> > It does. But does it shift the problem to 36+, rather than 29? In
her
> > 20s her subconscious instincts are for nest and children.
>
> I don't see how this holds true, when young women are entering jobs
and
> college more and more.  It seems to me that both women and men have a
> natural desire to procreate, but that doesn't mean that women don't
> have other desires that become more important to them, like school
and
> work.
>

Please read survey after survey after survey. Do your own even.

I'm fully behind women who want to work outside the home, but you are
against women who want to work inside it, and you're supposed to be the
feminist.

I also fully support the one percent of women who can understand maths
beyond the derivation of the quadratic equation, who wish to become
scientists, but I don't see why all men should be taxed to give the
other 99% the chance, when that money could be spent on defence,
healthcare, or schools.

Do you have any idea how ridiculous you sound Parg, being a feminist
openly acknowledging your denial of women's choice to be a mother?



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/11/05 4:42:12 PM ---