From: "John D.Wentzky" 

"Attila"  wrote in message
news:3ps5031j65h7i11c0bd54jqkue7236kcqm{at}4ax.com...
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 08:54:13 -0400, "John D.Wentzky"
>  in alt.abortion with message-id
>  wrote:
>
>>"Attila"  wrote in message
>>news:dmp403d4stjkbb26uairtbs3osftcv4gsp{at}4ax.com...
>>> On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:44:46 -0400, "J Young"

>>> in alt.abortion with message-id

>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>In an apparent challenge to the Supreme Court opinion Roe v. Wade, on
>>>>March
>>>>20, 2007, Georgia lawmakers introduced the following
Resolution (HR 536)
>>>>to
>>>>amend the state Constitution: "A RESOLUTION proposing
an amendment to
>>>>the
>>>>Constitution so as to provide that the paramount right to life
>>>
>>> Exactly where can this 'right to life' be found?
>>
>>In the preamble to the Constitution where it says, "secure the blessings
>>of
>>liberty to ourselves and our posterity".
>>Currently, that statement is not being honored in law.
>
> I see nothing there about any 'right to life'.

"ourselves and our posterity".
You think those people had no right to be alive?

>>
>>> Please be specific as I am interested in details such as exactly how and
>>> when it applies,
>>> how it is enforced and by who, and what are any penalties involved.
>>
>>Patience.
>>"The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their
>>offices during good behaviour,"
>>This gives authority to the people to remove judges from the bench,  if
>>the
>>judges are found out of good behavior.
>>
>
> Did you even read the question before posting an 'answer'?

Am i supposed to come up with *all* the details for you so you can present
it to your bosses?
Remember, I have copyright protection on my words.

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag