From: "John D.Wentzky" 

 wrote in message
news:1174579792.210274.7470{at}l75g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> On Mar 22, 8:47 am, "John D.Wentzky"

> wrote:
>>  wrote in message
>>
>> news:1174543253.822848.309870{at}o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Mar 22, 12:44 am, "J Young"
 wrote:
>> >> More and more each day, it appears the efforts of the pro-life
>> >> movement
>> >> are
>> >> paying dividends.
>>
>> >>http://www.covenantnews.com/abortion/archives/028649.html
>>
>> >> In an apparent challenge to the Supreme Court opinion Roe
v. Wade, on
>> >> March
>> >> 20, 2007, Georgia lawmakers introduced the following Resolution (HR
>> >> 536)
>> >> to
>> >> amend the state Constitution: "A RESOLUTION
proposing an amendment to
>> >> the
>> >> Constitution so as to provide that the paramount right to life is
>> >> vested
>> >> in
>> >> each human being from the moment of fertilization without regard to
>> >> age,
>> >> race, sex, health, function, or condition of dependency; to provide
>> >> for
>> >> submission of this amendment for ratification or rejection; and for
>> >> other
>> >> purposes."
>>
>> > I doubt this one will fly, or if it does, stand, but...
>> >From this amendment's ratification onwards, every
>> > miscarriage in Georgia will require a police investigation.
>>
>> No it won't, you idiot.
>>
>> > And miscarriage is a *very* common outcome of
>> > pregnancy,
>>
>> Which should tell you that the state has no right to violate the privacy
>> rights of individuals.
>>
>> > often before the mother is even aware
>> > that she's pregnant.
>>
>> So, idiot, how you going to detect such miscarriages, state control
>> freak?
>
> Since you've completely missed my point, let me
> put this in terms that you're better able to
> understand:  I know you are, but what am I?

Did you mean that you think the State would want to investigate every
miscarriage when they don't even know if a miscarriage occured?

> --
> Walt Smith
> Firelock on DALNet
>

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag