| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: ATM Diffraction due to secondary sizing |
From: Paul Cousoulis
To: atm{at}shore.net
Reply-To: Paul Cousoulis
I don't understand. Taper what? The tube opening or the mirror itself?
Paul
Richard Schwartz wrote:
>
> And to carry your argument further, a refractor with NO central obstruction
> might do even better. But even this can be improved on by APODIZING:
> instead of a sharp chop off of the aperture at the edge, have a gradual
> tapering. That will take light out of the first ring and put it into the
> center (while making the center slightly larger). The result should be
> improved ability to see low contrast dark features on a bright background at
> the highest possible powers.
--- BBBS/NT v4.00 MP
* Origin: Email Gate (1:379/1.100)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.