On 12 Mar 2005 00:10:12 -0600, Patrick Lee Humphrey 
wrote:

>Grizzlie Antagonist  writes:
>
>>On 11 Mar 2005 01:30:07 -0600, Patrick Lee Humphrey 
>>wrote:
>
>>>Grizzlie Antagonist  writes:
>
>>>>On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 06:58:04 GMT, rfischer{at}bolt.sonic.net (Ray
>>>>Fischer) wrote:
>
>>>>>Grizzlie Antagonist 
 wrote:
>>>>>>On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:45:17 -0600,
"Lazarus" 
>>>>>>wrote:
>
>>>[...]
>
>>>>>>>Infanticide isn't legal.  Grow a brain, OK?
>
>>>>>>Infanticide IS legal.  It's called abortion.
>
>>>>>You're either a moron for not even knowing what
"infant" means
>>>>>or your a liar who doesn't care.
>
>>>>Take a look at a photograph of an unborn fetus some day,
>>>>old-man-who-knocks-up-little-girls-and-kills-their-young.
>
>>>Why aren't you calling the cops?  (Besides the annoying detail
that they'd
>>>likely not appreciate you wasting their time.)
>
>>Next time you ask me this question, sissy boy, I'll just delete it and
>>declare that I've won the debate.
>
>...which keeps in line with your pretense that you ever debate at all.  (It's
>not rocket science to figure out that you and debate are estranged, with
>extreme prejudice.)  


That's good, because you are far from capable of engaging in rocket
science.

On the other hand, those nose cones are probably an ever-present
reminder of something that you're lacking.


>>You've been reduced to arguing that the existence of state of affairs
>>is ipso facto proof of its innate morality.
>
>>How would the police respond, sissy boy, if you called them up and
>>asked them to put a stop to the U.S. role in Iraq?  Does that mean
>>that you are precluded from questioning that role?
>
>You can question it all you want.  I'd rather question the Republican Taliban
>morons about it, since they've got a bit more to do with its promotion than
>the local cops.  


Oh no, SMF, under YOUR reasoning -- under YOUR reasoning, mind you,
not MY reasoning -- you're not ALLOWED to question the U.S. role in
Iraq.  

You're not ALLOWED to question the "Republican Taliban morons" about
it; in fact, you aren't even allowed to use that sort of derogatory
language to describe them.

After all, you're using the LEGALITY of abortion as a means of morally
justifying it.

So by that same reasoning, any neocon hawk could use the certifiable
and unalterable fact of the U.S. role in Iraq - and the fact that you
can't put a stop to that role by calling the police - as a means of
"proving" that the U.S. role in Iraq is moral.

How do you like that, Dr. Faustus?  I had a feeling that this would
happen.  Like Mephistopheles, I tied a metaphorical hangman's noose
and invited you to stick your pencil neck inside it.  And like Dr.
Faustus, you obliged me.


>>>>A picture of an unborn fetus look a lot like you did before you were
>>>>aborted.
>
>>>Thanks for illustrating why you shouldn't post while you're higher than a
>>>kite.  
>
>>Thanks for illustrating why you shouldn't post while you're lower than
>>pond scum.
>
>Might as well declare victory and run away, whiny child.  You'll just have to
>live with my opinion of you.  


Well, don't just sit there, Patricia.  Call 713 308-8000 and tell the
nice person there that you have a low opinion of me and that you want
me arrested.


--------------------------------------
grizzlieantagonist{at}yahoo.com

"Ladies and gentlemen - let's have a round of applause for tonight's
player of the game - FRAN-CIS-CO SAN-N-N-N-TOS!
    - Brian Anthony (P.A. announcer at Grizzlie Stadium), June 11, 2004


"Men are qualified for civil liberty in exact proportion to their
disposition to put moral chains upon their own appetites;
 in proportion as their love of justice is above their rapacity; in
proportion as their soundness and sobriety of 
 understanding is above their vanity and presumption; in proportion as they
are more disposed to listen to the counsels of
 the wise and good, in preference to the flattery of knaves.  Society
cannot exist unless a controlling power upon will
 and appetite be placed somewhere, and the less of it there is within, the
more there must be without.  It is ordained in
 the eternal constitution of things that men of intemperate minds cannot be
free.  Their passions forge their fetters."
     
     - Edmund Burke, Letter to a Member of the National Assembly (1791)


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/12/05 4:56:26 AM ---