marthawhite2000{at}yahoo.co.uk wrote:

> For all women in the world.
>
> There are enough studs out there for every woman if they're willing to
> share.
>
> I would like to ask all women in the world to mate with the smartest
> richest male.
>
> Why? Because I am rich and I am sick fucking tired of supporting the
> rest of the population with worse Genes than I am.

You don't know that becuase you are *lucky*
enough to be rich that you have beeter genes
than anyone else. Just take a look at the
hostiry the briotish royal family for a fine
example of some of the richest people in history
and some of the daftest.

D.


> So ladies....
>
> Males want as many females as possible. There are many rich
> millionaires and billionaires want to love, hug, and knock you up.
>
> The richer, smarter, and attractive the males, the less likely they use
> violence to keep females in line.

Are you a jerk or are you a jerk? Lawyers also
beat their wive klutz.

> Only poor males need to resort to beating, wife burning, genital
> mutilation, and government's laws to attract females. Why settle for
> such males? Pick richer ones.

But the rich guys only want the most
drop-dead-gorgeous females (are you one of
these) and what about all the girls who aren't
so drop-dead-gorgeous?

D.

> We, the alpha males want women to choose all they want because we know
> that when women can choose, they choose us.

So, are you an alpha male who uses the name
MARTHA WHITE?

D.

> I know you've been indoctrinated by romance and stuff. But guess what,
> that's bullshit.
>
> The whole point of romance, monogamy, etc. is to RATION females to less
> desirable males. Often, forceful indoctrination is done under the
> pretext of protecting females' interest. Any opposing opinion is
> called offensive for females.
>
> I know many of my females' friends that are NOT happy in marriage.
> Some are trapped there prevented from divorcing by the law. If the
> females no longer want him, and she's forced, that's rape right?
> Well, that's marriage. Legalize rape.
>
> Is that the kind of life you want to have ladies? That's what happens
> to women that are trapped into a marriage relationship with a lesser
> cock.
>
> It's natural that women are happier with guys like me than be the
> only one for lesser cocks. A few have chosen so, and I want more. Of
> course. Richer smarter males provide more money and better genes.

Richness and so-called smartness do not
correlate with genes.

You are a jerk of unparalleled magnitude.

The core issue of Darwinistic superiority is to
survive and reproduce as many copies of yourself
as possible.

In the present world it is likely that the best
genes are those of the serial rapist. He gets it
in there; does the business; goes through
numerous females and leaves any numberr of
children behind. He may go to prison in the end;
and for a long time (which takes him out of the
reproductive loop) but, on average, he may well
still leave more coppies of himself behind.

As for females choosing the optimum sperm they
should be very young females in their
reproductive prome: about eighteen years of age,
and should be selecting very old men who are
still fit and able and show no signs of genetic
illnesses - they will be the ones who have
survived and show good long-term health - e.g.
have the best genes to offer.

Wealth in today's rather synthetic social
contruct is a very fragile basis for selecting
good genes.

D.



> Of course, ladies, if you aim for high quality cock, you'll be in
> crowded place. So you got to share. However, sharing has a benefit too.
> When you aim for guys that already have females, you know that the guy
> is capable enough to attract females. That improve the probability that
> you get good genes right? Don't you get turned on being approached by
> rich smart studs?
>
> But so what? Our instincts are built for gene pool survival. Your eggs
> are limited. You get pregnant for 9 months after you got knocked up.
>
> Don't you want the best genes to fertilize your egg?
>
> Now, sharing males have one disadvantage. The money is rationed too.
> But so what?
>
> 1% of a billionaires' wealth is more than 100% of floor moppers wealth.
> And then you got better genes ladies.

There is no correlation between wealth and good
genes. ALso there is only a limited correlation
between intelligence and success.

D.

> Even males like me don't mind sharing once in a while if the women are
> pretty enough.

Exactly! If the girls are pretty enough.

D.

> You see, what we, rich people fear from sharing females, are
> consequences of having to give away wealth proportional with our money.
> If it's not proportional so what? We also hate being tricked into
> supporting other's kid through marriage and adultery. As long as things
> are front front, we're fine.
>
> Also, don't get married. Marriage is a trap to bond you to some
> lesser cocks. Marriage contracts are heavily regulated by
> government's that serve the interest of less desirable males.

You really have a got a problem mate. Are you
short of it or something?

D.

> Women, why not decide your own term of sex relationship rather than
> letting lesser cocks decide what's best for you?

The only true test of a lesser or greretaer cock
is the success or otherwise of the offspring -
jerk. Even that can be questionable.

> So ladies, ignore what churches, schools, and Disney taught you. If you
> want happiness, aim for quality. Let the lesser cocks go fuck
> themselves and jerk off. Aim for rich smart males like us. We love you.
> Why settle for your equal if you can aim higher?
>
> I am not sexist. I am just a rich smart male that knows what women
> instinctively want. That's why many chicks want me. I just want more.
> Rich smart males want to spread our superior genes to as many females
> as possible through consensual means. Why we are immoral?
>
> Now, I know rich smart males are rare. That happens because there are
> many laws that prevent us from being available to you.
>
> For example, alimony, palimony, and child support is proportional with
> men's wealth. Now, we get nervous attracting females under that law.
> Why not let females choose the kind of financial commitment that she
> want?
>
> Females will be better off having sex for $100,000 per year from a
> billionaire than having sex for $10,000 per year with a floor mopper
> right? Why not let the females choose?
>
> However, such mutually beneficial arrangements are prevented because
> lesser cocks dictate that all sexual relationship has to be based on
> love that's supposedly shouldn't be shared. Bull shit...

Have you never heard of gold diggers mate. For a
rich, smart male you are amazingly stupid.

What about the quality of the fathering you will
provide; and to *ALL* those children you are
proposing to have.

And what about the quality of the mothering that
your bit of leg-over will provide?

D.

> The real problem is because the lesser cocks wouldn't get any. So, they
> make laws against that. And then they trick females that the laws are
> there to protect females' interest. Of course not.

Lesser cocks will still score mate. You just
haven't got enough to keep 3,000,000,000 women
happy - not even with that ego of yours.

D.

> Females like any other HUMAN beings will have their interest served
> with CHOICES of what to do with their body. Prohibition of mutually
> consensual acts between males and females will always hurt females
> interest.

You might be a little more plausible if your
command of written english was a little better.

D.

> Ladies, if there is enough of you that sign this petition, I can use
> this as justification to eradicate all such laws. Then rich smart males
> will be available to you.

BOLLOCKS. You don't seem to understand why the
laws are there or what brought them into existence.

D.

> If women say blankly what they want loud and clear, lesser cocks will
> have harder time limiting your CHOICE under the pretext of protecting
> you.
>
> So please sign up. Also allow me to see your email so I can introduce
> you to rich smart males, including my self. There's an option that
> says private email.

"MY SELF" is one word jerk.

> I love you ladies...
>
> Sign the petition here:
> http://petitiononline.com/sexwith
>
> Cotam
>


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/12/05 12:56:34 PM ---