From: "H Dickmann" 


"Andrealphus"  wrote in message
news:PGEMh.13212$PL.1792{at}newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> In News Z6vMh.25507$68.19385{at}bignews8.bellsouth.net,, BAM at
> mcca5761{at}blahblahbellsouth.net, typed this:
>
>> "Andrealphus"  wrote in message
>> news:VatMh.15183$tD2.8746{at}newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>>> In News 1174538192_2301{at}sp6iad.superfeed.net,, J Young at
>>> youngopinions{at}aol.com, typed this:
>>>
>>>> The Catholic Church's harshest critics will be predictably silent
>>>> about this article.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Are you saying that because they do some good in the world that the
>>> fact that they protected pedophiles in their priesthood shoudl be
>>> overlooked?
>>
>> Hypocrite! You care nothing for children and have no sexual
>> limitations.
>
> Nonsense. I care only for the children.  You're trying to protect the
> church.

The Church doesn't own the Priests. The Priests, Nuns, Bishops and even the
Pope are voluntary workers who work for the Church without wages.


>
>
>>
>> Secondly, there were two pedophiles
>
> You still don't get this, and you never will.  It doesn't matter how many
> pedophiles there were, 1, or 1001, it doesn't matter.  What matters is
> that Catholic Church's failure to report the offenders to the proper
> authority instead of transferring them from parish to parish whenever the
> heat got too intense.   The church aided, protected, and therefore enabled
> these offenders to molest hundreds of kids and teens over the course of
> decades. That, and only that, is what matters in these cases.  You don't
> get it, and unless your church gets it and gets it fast, they will be
> shelling out millions more.
>
> Get a clue.
>
>

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag