->  >         As to the
->  >         Trek explanations I've heard is that TOS Klingons were
->  >         Klingon/Human fusion and are a subset of the Klingons we see
->  >         today.  Adding to that, I've heard stories about TOS being
->  >         "Southern Klingons" and the Movie/TNG/DS9/VOY Klingons being
->  >         "Northern Klingons."  I really can't say myself.
->      That won't fly:  Kang, Kor, Koloth were introduced in TOS as "mongol
-> look" Klingon, yet in DSN  they all three were in one episode as "current"
-> Klingons!  EXPLAIN THAT!!!!!
->  * AmyBW v2.14 *
-> ... "If I jumped everytime a light when off I'd wind up talking to 
yself!"
-> --- AmyBW/MaxBlue 1.0
(1:387/721)
moe than likely, they had cosmetic surgery to become the more
traditional klingon warrior after the last romulan war. or it is simply
if they remade trek's classic episodes using george clooney and 90's
sgi and makeup effects before the turn of the 2nd decade of the 2nd
millenium, they would be depicted as theklingons who have the brows and
such.
by the way, i am from brownsville, texas.... and i happen to be
telneting to a bbs in louisiana because i have yet to discover a free
telnet in texas closer than the louisiana one and LD even as far as
harlingen is very costly.
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/Wildcat5! v2.0
---------------