From: "John D.Wentzky" 

"Anlatt the Builder"  wrote in message
news:1174630347.224105.71230{at}y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> On Mar 22, 7:09 am, "John D.Wentzky"

> wrote:
>> "thomas p."  wrote in message
>>
>> news:1174542611.921031.259270{at}l75g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On 21 Mar., 18:23, "John D.Wentzky"

>> > wrote:
>> >> "Ray Fischer"  wrote in message
>>
>> >>news:46015751$0$14102$742ec2ed{at}news.sonic.net...
>>
>> >> > John D.Wentzky  wrote:
>> >> >>"Anlatt the Builder"
 wrote in message
>> >> >>>  "John D.Wentzky"

>>
>> >> >>>> > Courts are permitted to declare
laws unconstitutional.
>>
>> >> >>>> Wrong.
>>
>> >> >>> Courts. Are not. Permitted. To declare laws.
Unconstitutional.
>>
>> >> >>> You actually claim that?
>>
>> >> >>Yes. At least in part.
>> >> >>There are rules to be adhered to.
>>
>> >> > Rules which you pull out of your ass.
>>
>> >> > The rules stated in the Constitution say that the
courts do have the
>> >> > responsibility to decide whether laws are unconstitutional.
>>
>> >> Which would give the USSC authority to strike down roevwade.
>>
>> > And your point would be?  Nobody argued that they agreed with every
>> > decision the court makes, only that the court has the right to
>> > determine the constitutionality of laws in cases brought before it.
>>
>> They can only determine something to be unconstitutional if it violates
>> the
>> Constitution.
>
> They decided, after due process,

...... in Texas.

> that the law violated the
> Constitution.

Wrong. Texas destroyed this shit.

> That's their job. Who should we let make the decision -
> you?

The USSC of 1973 erred.
They did not perform due diligence and they neglected the Constitution.
They criminally violated the right of States to govern themselves.

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag