From: Adam 

Don Hills wrote:

> In article , "Tony Ingenoso"

wrote:
>
>>When - quoteback please.
>>
>>I'm pretty easy on quantity or levels.  I'm willing to admit existence if a
>>single example of something is present.
>
>
> Here you go:
>
>
>>In article , "Tony Ingenoso"

wrote:
>>
>>>DU != enriched uranium.
>
>
> Looks like quibbling over the level of enrichment to me. Or would you really
> be quite happy for me to blow DU dust into your house's aircon intake but
> not "low enriched" uranium dust?
>
DU is far more "processed" that the uranium Saddam had.

Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5