Hello Benny!

06 Oct 20, Benny Pedersen wrote to Kai Richter:

 KR>> HTML will need multiple bytes to define a symbol.

 BP> same as unicode when its 8 bit charters

You got the point. You will have multibytes in unicode and multibytes plus
html around it.

 BP> programmers dont understand double encodeing problems

You can't blame a standard for that. There will be programmers that don't
understand html too.

 KR>> the software must know which symbol have to be displayed for that
 KR> KR>> multibyte sequence.

 BP> and unicode solve that much better then html, hmm

I never said that. You must have the multibyte sequence to define the symbol.
Why adding memory space and cpu requiring htmltags around it? I don't see the
advantage.

Regards

Kai

--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.4.7