On 07/07/17 21:01, Philip Draper wrote:
> In message 
>            The Natural Philosopher  wrote:
>
>> On 05/07/17 09:26, Kerr Mudd-John wrote:
>>> This promotion of bisexuality is just as bad as the promotion of
>>> homosexuality.
>
>> 1/. There's nowt aas queer as folk.
>
>> 2/. Darwin only demands that you are not so completely deluded as to
>> fail to copulate with a member of the opposite sex productively before
>> you die.
>
>> Put those two together and its clear that this is indeed the worst of
>> all possible worlds, balancing on the edge of being so completely
>> dysfunctional that it wipes out the race.
>
>> And the more we take the stress out of life, and cater for pathetic
>> minorities, the more likely it is to get even more dysfunctional.
>
>> 'Idiocracy' was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual.
>
> I do wonder where that 'quotation' from Darwin appears. It doesn't
> seem very Darwinian language. Maybe its actually a quottion from one
> of the numerous people who interpreted what Darwin said in terms of
> their own views.
>
It is simply deducible from Darwins principle of natural selection.

It isnt a quote from anybody, it is the logical consequence of a process
that elminates those who fail to breed successfully..

I do so love this modern idea that anything yoiu disagree with, no
matter how logical, and deduction is pure logic, can be dismissed as
'mere opinion'

Induction may be subject to such a challenge, but not deduction.

This bandar log response to science mathematics and politics is doomed
to ultimate failure.

Pythagoras is notr a 'matter of opinion': given te axioms of euclidian
plane gemotery, Pythaogras theorem is an implicit. The deductive 'proof'
is merely a step by step explication.

For the mentally challemged, consider a gene pool that is 100%
homosexual without exception. Where does the next generation come from?

The fact that homosexuality is and always has been common, shows that
plenty of homosexuals must have actually been bisexual. Assuming it is a
genetic predilection.

Of course if its simply a fashion, and has no basis in genetics, thats
another matter.




> Philip.
>
>
>


--
"In our post-modern world, climate science is not powerful because it is
true: it is true because it is powerful."

Lucas Bergkamp

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05