From: No One 

"John D.Wentzky"  writes:

> "No One"  wrote in message
> news:87fy7xiaj4.fsf{at}nospam.pacbell.net...
> > "John D.Wentzky"  writes:
> >
> >> "thomas p."  wrote in message
> >> news:1174542611.921031.259270{at}l75g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> >> > On 21 Mar., 18:23, "John D.Wentzky"

> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >> > And your point would be?  Nobody argued that they agreed
with every
> >> > decision the court makes, only that the court has the right to
> >> > determine the constitutionality of laws in cases brought
before it.
> >>
> >> They can only determine something to be unconstitutional if it
> >> violates the Constitution.  Check the Separation of powers
> >> requirement that was violated by the USSC in 1973 in roevwade.
> >
> > "Separation of powers" does not mean "Wentzky
agrees with the
> > decision."
>
> It means the USSC had no authority to override Texas' or any other State's
> non-roevwade position.

"Separation of powers" means no such thing.

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag