"Lee"  wrote in message
news:1110680624.240240.136680{at}z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> >80 % is not 'all', dear. 95% is not 'all', dear. 99.99999999999999999%
> is
> >not 'all', dear. even if 1% of all programmers were women then that
> means
> >there are women programmer but do tell, what has this got to do with
> women's
> >rights?
>
> I do not use the word 'all' in usenet posts.  I have not implied such
> in my OP.
I never said, 'you' did, dear.
>What are you babbling about?
A little defensive aren't you, dear?

>
> >8 hours work, 8 hours pleasure, 8 hours sleep. It's what we
> >call a full life.if you wish to pull 18 hours shifts then that's your
> choice
> >and I don't begrudge you of it but like I said, it's a question of
> >priorities!
>
> You are so dim as to be stupefying.
No I'm not, dear.
>I never claime that *I* was
> working 18 hour shifts.
I never said, 'you' did, dear.
A little defensive aren't you, dear?
>I was telling an anecdote of friends who have
> had to do so to vault their career and business onto a successful
> plane.
I know you were, dear. Talk about dim!
>
> If you chose to have that balance as a priority, then you will reap the
> rewards.  Then when a man who busted his tail earns more than you, or
> another woman who valued this work-life balance, you will realize that
> she is paid less because she did less, and she deserves to be paid
> less.
As long as you realise her sex has nothing to do with how much she did,
dear.
>
> If she worked 18 hours a day, then she too would have attained the same
> level of success.

I agree, dear even though it is a little obvious.

Aggy
>




--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/13/05 4:56:56 AM ---