On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 00:18:28 -0500, Sean_MacCloud
 wrote:

>
>
>Grizzlie Antagonist wrote:
>
>> On 12 Mar 2005 20:16:59 -0800, voice_of_reason{at}australia.edu wrote:
>>
>> >Greetings:
>> >
>> >A little while back a study was published that proported to equate the
>> >work done by a stay-at-home housewife to an annual that was in the 6
>> >figures. It was eventually debunked. And I'm trying to locate
>> >information concerning when and how it was debunked. Surfing the net, I
>> >find numerous undocumented references to the 6-figure salary....but
>> >nothing on the debunking.
>> >
>> >Does anyone out there have a link pointing towards the debunking and
>> >the actual value?
>> >
>> >Thanks!
>>
>> No, but how can it be six figures when affluent hausfraus and
>> professional women can get illegal aliens to do it for less than
>> minimum wage?
>>
>> And whether it's 6 figures, 7 figures, 5 figures, or 69 cents, the
>> whole idea is outrageous anyway because
>>
>> a) the man of the house usually has his share of household chores too;
>> no one suggests that HE is entitled to compensation for them;
>>
>> b) the woman of the house is SUPPOSED to be doing HER household chores
>> for the same reason that the man is supposed to assume the principal
>> wage-earner role - love and affection; and
>>
>> c) the woman of the house usually has control of her husband's income,
>> in any event - so why should she get to double-dip and receive extra
>> compensation?
>
>Because democracy's a great idea.
>
>let us pray.


The women, at least a large number of them, have heard you and are
acting upon what they've heard.

The trouble is that they've misunderstood.

They thought you said, "let us prey".



------------------------------------

grizzlieantagonist{at}yahoo.com

"Ladies and gentlemen - let's have a round of applause for tonight's
player of the game - FRAN-CIS-CO SAN-N-N-N-TOS!
    - Brian Anthony (P.A. announcer at Grizzlie Stadium), June 11, 2004


"Men are qualified for civil liberty in exact proportion to their
disposition to put moral chains upon their own appetites; in proportion as
their love of justice is above their rapacity; in proportion as their
soundness and sobriety of understanding is above their vanity and
presumption; in proportion as they are more disposed to listen to the
counsels of the wise and good, in preference to the flattery of knaves. 
Society cannot exist unless a controlling power upon will and appetite be
placed somewhere, and the less of it there is within, the more there must
be without.  It is ordained in the eternal constitution of things that men
of intemperate minds cannot be free.  Their passions forge their
fetters."
     
     - Edmund Burke, Letter to a Member of the National Assembly (1791)


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/13/05 4:56:54 AM ---