From: No One 

"John D.Wentzky"  writes:

> "No One"  wrote in message
> news:87k5x9iame.fsf{at}nospam.pacbell.net...
> > "John D.Wentzky"  writes:
> >
> >> "Dionisio"  wrote
in message
> >> news:4601f10f$0$16666$4c368faf{at}roadrunner.com...
> >> > John D.Wentzky wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>>The rules stated in the Constitution say that the
courts do have the
> >> >>>responsibility to decide whether laws are unconstitutional.
> >> >>
> >> >> Which would give the USSC authority to strike down roevwade.
> >> >
> >> > Well, of course it's got the authority. It's just never
seen a good
> >> > reason
> >> > to do so.
> >>
> >> Bullshit. You mean the USSC justices don't know the Constitution?
> >> How about that separation of powers clause that the USSC
ignored in 1973
> >> because of their own crimes when they tried to cover their own asses?
> >> Two crimes in this case.
> >> 1. Illegal abortion
> >> 2. Treason against the Constitution of the United States of America.
> >
> > Nonsense
>
> Your opinion of the Constitutional requirements. LOL!
>
> > - the Supreme Court declared an anti-abortion law illegal in
> > Roe versus Wade, but did not perform an abortion (which would be
> > illegal for the Supreme Court to do as the court would have to
> > practice medicine without a license) and it in no sense committed
> > "treason" (unless perhaps you mean installing King
George Bus to rule
> > over us in 2000 :-)).
>
> That is how it is suppoed to be to you?
> Weird.
> Are you trying to tell me that the AMA has an exclusive right to all
> abortion records?
> You are the fool if you think that.
>
> > Talk about delusions on Wentzky's part!

Wentzky, you are a complete and utter idiot.  Read what I actually posted
50 times in the perhaps futile hope that it might sink in.

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag