"_TR_"  wrote in message
news:17zri2d75kcu2$.19faplmz03mbk$.dlg{at}40tude.net...
> Doug Anderson wrote:
>> "John Royer"  writes:
>>> "Doug Anderson"  wrote:
>>>> "John Royer"  writes:

>> [For those whose loved ones have tried to or succeeded in suicide, and
>> I know that is true for some here - I don't mean to be making light of
>> it, just of the idea that every health problem needs to be divided up
>> into "men's" or "women's."]

Why not? isn't that exactly what you are advocating and defending with
regard to breast cancer?
Isn't that exactly what the feminists are saying..spend more money on womens
issues?

How about a radical thought. take the total amount of money paid in taxes as
a percent of gender and allocate funding for medical issues based on that?
I'm not advocating it, but the the feminist formula which calls for the
majority of spending on womens issues is a hell of a lot less equitable than
the 50-50 formula.

> Then refrain from doing it, whether the issue is suicide, cancer or
> hangnails.
>
> But you can't.  You wouldn't get to wallow in feminist victimism-by-proxy
> if you had to take both sexes into account, would you, lad.
>
> TR II
>
> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
> News==----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
> Newsgroups
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
> =----




--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/13/05 12:57:00 PM ---