MCP wrote:

> http://www.kobtv.com/index.cfm?viewer=storyviewer&id=17728&cat=HOME
>
> Last Update: 03/11/2005 10:42:44 AM
> By: Todd Dukart
> Video
>
> There was no baby, a judge said. And now an investigation into why the
> "father" of the child had to pay $20,000 in support is
nearly finished.
>
> Steve Barreras was ordered to pay child support to his ex-wife, Viola
> Trevino, for a daughter she said she had.
>
> But when Trevino was ordered to produce the 5-year-old girl, she apparently
> took another woman's 2-year-old girl into the courtroom several hours after
> the deadline. That's when the judge ruled the child never existed.
>
> In December, Gov. Bill Richardson ordered an investigation into why Barreras
> had to pay for so long.
>
> Richardson announced Thursday that the investigation is nearly over. That
> was welcome news to Richar' Farr, an advocate for non-custodial parents who
> runs the Internet radio station KrightsRadio.com.
>
> "In fact, they're taking one whole aspect - the non-custodial parent - and
> many times running them into financial ruin and not allowing them to be with
> their kids as well," Farr said.
>
> Richardson said he was outraged when he heard of Barreras' case.
>
> "It's pretty outrageous what happens," Richardson said.
"We should have
> definite proof of the existence of the child at the very least."
>
> State courts hearing child support cases will require a photo of the child
> starting in about a month. That rule is being put in place as a direct
> result of the Trevino case.
>
> Farr has organized a rally for the rights of non-custodial parents. It's
> scheduled for Friday at noon outside Albuquerque's district courthouse.
>
>

Having read this and numerous other posts that
describe the most astonishing deciets of females
I remain amazed that STILL the judges will do
nothing to bring females under effective control.

One is left only to wonder to what degree the
females of the species must stoop before the law
will do something about it.

We cannort beleive that a photograph will do. Do
we not no that just around the corner is some
female who will present the photograph of
someone else's child in this circumstance.

It is clear that support orders should be
completely banned; that females, who have
claimed complete control over their own
reproductivity, must accept complete
responsibility for that reprodictivity.

D.


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/13/05 12:57:01 PM ---