| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: ATM Diffraction due to secondary sizing |
From: "Kristopher Barrett" To: Reply-To: "Kristopher Barrett" > Here is the problem though. Commercial telescopes of the cassegrain > veriety often have central obstructions approaching 37% by diameter > which Texereau may well have baulked at the idea of. There is however no > question about these telescopes' ability to resolve very fine detail on > the planets. They are in fact among the top performers. So my question > is (in the words of a true potiticain) who is almost right and who is > almost wrong? These commercial OTAs are Schmidt-Cass., and have a corrector plate, rAther than a simple window. They fix contrast problems caused by the big secondary via a bigger focal length. And yes, they are a compromise. You can improve contrast by making the secondary smaller and still keep the long f-stop....Meade sells some Schmidt-Newtonians that do just that. You could also just use a greater perscription for your corrector plate: http://members.cox.net/rmscott/lh_scope/ -- Regards, Kristopher Barrett http://www.cotse.net/users/kbarrett --- BBBS/NT v4.00 MP* Origin: Email Gate (1:379/1.100) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.