| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Catholics Will Do Everything Possible To Prevent Homosexual Civil U |
From: "John D.Wentzky"
"Ray Fischer" wrote in message
news:46036227$0$14089$742ec2ed{at}news.sonic.net...
> John D.Wentzky wrote:
>>"Ray Fischer" wrote in message
>>news:4602b60f$0$14085$742ec2ed{at}news.sonic.net...
>>> John D.Wentzky wrote:
>>>>"thomas p." wrote in message
>>>>news:1174542611.921031.259270{at}l75g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>>>>> On 21 Mar., 18:23, "John D.Wentzky"
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> "Ray Fischer"
wrote in message
>>>>>>
>>>>>> news:46015751$0$14102$742ec2ed{at}news.sonic.net...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > John D.Wentzky
wrote:
>>>>>> >>"Anlatt the Builder"
wrote in message
>>>>>> >>> "John D.Wentzky"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>> > Courts are permitted to
declare laws unconstitutional.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>> Wrong.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>> Courts. Are not. Permitted. To
declare laws. Unconstitutional.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>> You actually claim that?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>Yes. At least in part.
>>>>>> >>There are rules to be adhered to.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > Rules which you pull out of your ass.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > The rules stated in the Constitution say that
the courts do have
>>>>>> > the
>>>>>> > responsibility to decide whether laws are
unconstitutional.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which would give the USSC authority to strike down roevwade.
>>>>>
>>>>> And your point would be? Nobody argued that they
agreed with every
>>>>> decision the court makes, only that the court has the right to
>>>>> determine the constitutionality of laws in cases
brought before it.
>>>>
>>>>They can only determine something to be unconstitutional if
it violates
>>>>the
>>>>Constitution.
>>>
>>> And laws against abortion violated the constitution.
>>
>>No they didn't.
>
> Yes, moron, they did.
You thought they did, but you can't show any to prove your opinion.
> Your idiotic whining doesn't change that fact.
Your illicit opinion doesn't cure the disease.
>>They violated man's right to kill.
>
> There is no right to kill, idiot.
There most certainly is a right to kill, and it is legal. I guess you think
we are supposed to allow any enemy within our borders to attack people in
the USA and survive.
--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag
* Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)SEEN-BY: 633/267 5030/786 @PATH: 261/38 123/500 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.