From: "John D.Wentzky" 

"No One"  wrote in message
news:873b3wmyni.fsf{at}nospam.pacbell.net...
> "John D.Wentzky"  writes:
>
>> "No One"  wrote in message
>> news:87odmk1zf3.fsf{at}nospam.pacbell.net...
>> > "John D.Wentzky"
 writes:
>> >
>> >> "No One"  wrote
in message
>> >> news:87k5x9iame.fsf{at}nospam.pacbell.net...
>> >> > "John D.Wentzky"
 writes:
>> >> >
>> >> >> "Dionisio"
 wrote in message
>> >> >> news:4601f10f$0$16666$4c368faf{at}roadrunner.com...
>> >> >> > John D.Wentzky wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>>The rules stated in the Constitution
say that the courts do have
>> >> >> >>>the
>> >> >> >>>responsibility to decide whether
laws are unconstitutional.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Which would give the USSC authority to
strike down roevwade.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Well, of course it's got the authority.
It's just never seen a
>> >> >> > good
>> >> >> > reason
>> >> >> > to do so.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Bullshit. You mean the USSC justices don't know
the Constitution?
>> >> >> How about that separation of powers clause that
the USSC ignored in
>> >> >> 1973
>> >> >> because of their own crimes when they tried to
cover their own
>> >> >> asses?
>> >> >> Two crimes in this case.
>> >> >> 1. Illegal abortion
>> >> >> 2. Treason against the Constitution of the
United States of
>> >> >> America.
>> >> >
>> >> > Nonsense
>> >>
>> >> Your opinion of the Constitutional requirements. LOL!
>> >>
>> >> > - the Supreme Court declared an anti-abortion law illegal in
>> >> > Roe versus Wade, but did not perform an abortion
(which would be
>> >> > illegal for the Supreme Court to do as the court would have to
>> >> > practice medicine without a license) and it in no
sense committed
>> >> > "treason" (unless perhaps you mean
installing King George Bus to
>> >> > rule
>> >> > over us in 2000 :-)).
>> >>
>> >> That is how it is suppoed to be to you?
>> >> Weird.
>> >> Are you trying to tell me that the AMA has an exclusive
right to all
>> >> abortion records?
>> >> You are the fool if you think that.
>> >>
>> >> > Talk about delusions on Wentzky's part!
>> >
>> > Wentzky, you are a complete and utter idiot.  Read what I actually
>> > posted 50 times in the perhaps futile hope that it might sink in.
>>
>> I read it once and knew you were still too ignorant to know the law and
>> use
>> it correctly.
>
> Read it again.  With enough practice, maybe some of it will sink in.

I already know you are against the USA.

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag