From: dmhills{at}attglobal.net (Don Hills)

In article , "Tony Ingenoso"
 wrote:
>So the "whole country" has this problem eh?
>
>This is a pretty strong statement.

Conceded.

We've wandered off the plot somewhere. The original point was that the US
military have spread a toxic and radiological agent in many places in Iraq.
They've spread it so widely that they haven't a hope of ever being able to
find it all and clean it up, even if they wanted to. The danger this poses
to the population in Iraq has been well documented online and elsewhere.
Discounting the sources with a strong agenda on one side or the other,
there are still many sources who can be considered authoritative and have a
neutral agenda. A Google search formulated to find sites belonging to
nuclear regulatory agencies and research facilities will find you many
hours of reading, with hard numbers and clinical studies.

I don't mind discussing all this with someone who's genuinely willing to
listen. But I see no sign of that in you, and having spent many hours
satisfying my own curiousity on the subject I have no wish to waste more
hours rehashing things I already know. So until something new comes up, I'm
"done with you".

--
Don Hills    (dmhills at attglobaldotnet)     Wellington, New Zealand
"New interface closely resembles Presentation Manager,
 preparing you for the wonders of OS/2!"
    -- Microsoft advertisement on the box for Windows 2.11 for 286

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5