| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: BBS nostalgia |
-=> Eric Oulashin wrote to Sean Dennis <=-
EO> could be created. One thing I did like, though, about BBSs back in the
EO> day is that they had a lot more of a local feel to them - Most of the
EO> users were in the same geographic area.
POTS lines, flat-rate local calling and expensive LD calling drove local
flavor. I loved the fact that we could have BBS gettogethers, meet
someplace central to the board, and meet face-to-face. We'd meet 4x/year.
EO> I know what you mean. But even if a BBS has a web site, POP/SMTP, FTP,
EO> etc., users aren't forced to use them. Users can still use only the
EO> telnet/dialup, and there, I think BBSs have the same feel they used to.
I'd like to preserve the telnet interface for people like me who started
out BBSing, but find some way to make a web interface with a similar look
and feel to "real" web BBSes like Vbulletin. That, IMO, is the way to get
new users into BBSing.
Synchronet has a web interface, but it appears to be a web-ified BBS front
end. I'm talking about a native-feeling web interface that would be
comfortable to an end-user who's never used a BBS but has posted on web
bulletin boards before.
--kW
kurt weiske | kweiske at realitycheckbbs dot org
realitycheckBBS | http://realitycheckbbs.org
... Eval Day 1005
--- MultiMail/Win32 v0.49
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32
* Origin: realitycheckBBS | http://www.realitycheckbbs.org (1:218/700)SEEN-BY: 3/0 633/267 640/954 712/0 313 550 620 848 @PATH: 218/700 10/1 261/38 712/848 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.