From: Adam Flinton 

Tony Ingenoso wrote:
> Maybe you whould read what I write rather than reading what you WISH I had
> written.
>
> I never said the planes were "evidence of WMD" - and will
offer you this
> very generous wager.  I will put up 1000:1 payoff to you if you can produce
> any statements claiming same.  Wager payoff amount cna be anything up to the
> min of the total wealth of either of us.  Are you game?
>
> That statement simply doesn't exist John - you're making this all up.
>
> What I *DID* say was if someone was willing to go to these lengths to bury
> planes and tanks, then it would not be unreasonable for them to have maybe
> buried something else.  No definitive statement there - just a statement of
> a probability greater than zero existing.  That probability could be
> anything from .0000000000000000000000000000001 to
> .9999999999999999999999999999 - but to deny that it exists and the
> probability is exactly 0.00 is flat out stupid IMO.
>

Tony, get a grip on chemistry & then come back & try to engage your
brain before making asinine comments such as this.

How "reactive" is a tank?

How "reactive" is a Su22?

If I were to grind down a T-72 into a powder & sprinkle it over a city,
how many people would be affected?


Adam

> "John Cuccia"  wrote in message
> news:efeqd15hg60rffi4am2nhg3vb4hdpscbsm{at}4ax.com...
>
>>I believe we found a few planes buried in the desert.  I do not
>>believe that those planes are evidence of buried WMD materials, as you
>>implied earlier in this thread.
>>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5