From: "Robert Comer" 

> If the only argument you have is regarding seals, then your arguments are
> pretty effing weak because they're normal maintenance items anyway and
> would
> be checked before any aircraft were put back in service.

Okay, I broke my own word about not posting again in this subthread, the
seals was your argument, not mine, and you brought it up about some
hypothetical buried tanks, not airplanes.  My argument is that the plane,
or tanks, wouldn't have been useful period.

- Bob Comer 


"Tony Ingenoso"  wrote in message
news:42e2ba74{at}w3.nls.net...
> If the only argument you have is regarding seals, then your arguments are
> pretty effing weak because they're normal maintenance items anyway and
> would
> be checked before any aircraft were put back in service.
>
> "Robert Comer"  wrote in message
> news:42e222b3$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> You're still thinking underground is the same. no matter what the
>> underground is like, sand is different than soil. (even though soil may
> have
>> some sand in it, it's not all sand)
>>
>> This is my last post on this subthread, and my reason is the same as my
> last
>> post.
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5