| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | BBS nostalgia |
EO> I thought WWIV was okay, although from a user standpoint, something EO> seemed a bit different about it, and I didn't like its user EO> experience as much as other BBS programs. I tried setting up a EO> WWIV BBS though and thought it was really easy to set up - it was EO> the first one I was able to get set up successfully. But as I EO> didn't like it as a user, I decided not to go with WWIV. I ended EO> up using RemoteAccess for my BBS, as I thought it was really EO> flexible and robust, and I enjoyed using other RemoteAccess BBSs. EO> I also liked how it looked - I thought its tools had a nice EO> professional look. from one RA BBS sysop to another, welcome back :P yes, i still run RA, FD and FE... on POTS dialup and telnet... yup, still on OS/2, too :P i'm one of the last few RA, FD, and FE beta teams members still kicking in fidonet, too... but i do see and interact with the original core developers almost every day... )\/(ark* Origin: (1:3634/12) SEEN-BY: 3/0 633/267 640/954 712/0 313 550 620 848 @PATH: 3634/12 123/500 261/38 712/848 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.