From: "Glenn Meadows" 

Also, the district has been changed demographic wise from what it was
before, so the repub/dem ratios are different.

--

Glenn M.
"Gary Britt"  wrote in message
news:42f03ea9$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> Yes in normal circumstances, but this election wasn't normal
> circumstances.
> The democrap spent more money than the republican.  Money poured in from
> the
> national party and all over the country to desperately try to create some
> false momentum.  Further, your comment does NOT address the fact that this
> democrap ran a *STEALTH* candidacy.  He ran as a PRO BUSH, PRO IRAQ
> republican, when he is in fact a liberal democrap against the war and
> against conservative policies.  You just couldn't tell that from his
> commercials.
>
> So if your point is, if a democrap pretends to be a pro Bush conservative
> and never mentions the fact they are a democrap and a liberal, and if that
> same democrap out spends the republican candidate to a considerable
> degree,
> then in such circumstances that democrap can still LOSE by a smaller
> margin,
> then ok I agree with you.   But none of that spells bad news for Bush, the
> Republicans, or conservatives.  Just the opposite actually.
>
> Gary
>
>
>
> "Robert G Lewis"  wrote in message
> news:42f03c6c{at}w3.nls.net...
>>
>> "Gary Britt"  wrote in message
>> news:42f039d1$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> > Democraps declared the election for a federal congressional
> representative
>> > seat in southern Ohio to be a bell weather election and referendum on
>> > Bush,
>> > republicans, and the war in Iraq.  Huge amounts of democrap money
>> > poured
>> > into the district from all over the country.  The MSM did its part by
>> > portraying the election as a huge referendum on Bush, the war, and the
>> > republican chances in 2006.  They hoped to get false momentum built off
> of
>> > a
>> > win in this race, which is why they tried so hard to buy the election.
>> >
>> > The funny part was the now loser democrap Hackett, ran ad campaigns
>> > that
>> > *featured* president Bush in a favorable light, showed Hackett in his
>> > military uniform, actually ran statements from the candidate *AGREEING*
>> > with
>> > various general strawman statements put into Bush's mouth.  These
>> > commercials NEVER mentioned the fact that he was a democrap, a liberal,
>> > against the war in Iraq, etc etc.
>> >
>> > For a bell weather election and referendum on Bush and the republicans
> it
>> > seems the democraps think the only way to win is to *HIDE* from their
> own
>> > record, *HIDE* from their own positions, and *HIDE* from their own
> policy
>> > preferences.  In short to try and win this bell weather election to
>> > show
>> > the
>> > country hates BUSH they tried *LIE* to the electorate and *PRETEND* to
> be
>> > *REPUBLICANS*.
>> >
>> > Now if all this lying had worked you bet the articles in the MSM would
>> > talk
>> > about how Bush and the republicans were rebuked at the poles, never
> would
>> > they mention the minor point that in order to win the democrap had to
> "run
>> > like a bastard goat trying to get the last biscuit from Dan Rather's
>> > country
>> > Texas cabin" AWAY FROM THEIR REAL RECORDS AND AGENDA AND POLICIES.
>> >
>> > Alas, the MSM won't have to put themselves through these LIES, because
>> > even
>> > though Hackett ran as a pro-Bush republican, THE ELECTORATE WENT FOR
>> > THE
>> > REAL REPUBLICAN!!!!!!!!
>> >
>> > So much for bell weather elections:
>> >
>> > Schmidt Wins
>> >
>> > The local affiliate Fox 19 has just called the race for Jean Schmidt
> over
>> > Paul Hackett 52 to 48 percent.
>> >
>> > Many thanks to all The Buzz readers who helped keep all of us on
> breaking
>> > news side of this.
>> >
>> > And thanks to everyone who kept reading late tonight as well.
>> >
>> > The Channel 9 affiliate has called also called the race for Schmidt.
>> >
>> > [ 08/02/2005 11:05 PM]
>> >
>> >
>>
>> That's a very good showing in that district for the Democrats. It wasn't
>> expected to be anywhere near that close.
>>
>>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5