From: John Cuccia 

I assume you know that the snippet  you quoted was written by Pat Buchanan,
a fully credentialed conservative Republican who was kicking liberal ass
when W and Karl Rove were still coke-snorting wastrels, and not by liberal
pinko me.

Given the adminstration's continual malicious and false juxtaposition of
9/11 and Iraq, it'll be easy to convince their sheep that if Clinton had
gotten Osama when he had a chance then we wouldn't have needed to topple
Saddam.


On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 10:12:08 -0400, Monte Davis
 wrote:

>John Cuccia  wrote:
>
>>Are we ready to leave that war-ravaged land without any assurance a
>>free, democratic, pro-Western Iraq will survive? Is President Bush
>>willing to settle for less than we all thought?
>>
>>So it would seem. For it is difficult to draw any other conclusion
>>from the just-completed Rumsfeld mission.
>
> Let's see... White House spin on
>Vietnamization -- I mean Iraqification -- goes to 5000 rpm.
>
>US troops withdraw, Hanoi -- I mean Tehran -- moves in, huge hostile
>Shiite demonstrations surround the Green Zone as the last US advisers
>are helicoptered out.
>
>Time passes.
>
>On Barktopia, Jeff, Tony, Mark, Gary & co. explain how it was actually
>Clinton's war, and how we woulda shoulda coulda won if only our troops
>hadn't been betrayed by the liberal media at home and then spat on by
>hippies -- .
>
>(I'm not sure how they're going to swing the Clinton part, but I have
>faith.)

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5