| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: internet was: telnet |
Re: Re: internet was: telnet By: NANCY BACKUS to ERIC OULASHIN on Sun Jan 23 2011 19:01:00 > There's always been practically no spam in FidoNet... and generally > flaming is kept under control (in the echos that aren't essentially > flame echos anyway, that is) as well, especially in the civil ones like > this one and the others I hang out in... :) (Yeah, yeah, I remember > that this one hasn't ALWAYS been this civil... but it's been pretty good > for a while now... ) :) There seems to still be some flaming in some of the echos.. Recently, I've heard some people refered to FidoNet as "Fight-O-Net" because of the lack of civility in some echos. I hadn't noticed that much before though, in the 90s. > There had been gating back and forth, not always with permission... It > was a not-really-so-good an idea, since mostly what it did was mess with > the safeguards that Fidonet had... I can understand that.. It seems that FidoNet has always been fairly moderated with rules, whereas Usenet is not. Eric --- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32* Origin: Digital Distortion: digdist.bbsindex.com (1:298/7) SEEN-BY: 3/0 633/267 640/954 712/0 313 550 620 848 @PATH: 298/7 5 123/500 261/38 712/848 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.