From: "Randy" 

As Shah used to say: "The answer to a fool is sielnce."

"Don Hills"  wrote in message
news:yBW+CtgaXCIN092yn{at}attglobal.net...
> In article , "Mark"
 wrote:
>>I find your explanation to be lacking and your conclusion that it would
>>cause a "kneejerk" reaction to be specious. But do try again.
>>
>>Next time though, please try and have a position instead of wasting time
>>with your lame games -- why on God's green Earth would anyone post
>>anything
>>if they "had no position to support?" >if
>>you have no opinion on the subject why are you wasting our time posting
>>lame
>>urls without any desire to comment on one side or the other?>
>
> I posted it because I knew Gary, at least, would bite like a hungry pike.
> You were a bonus, though not unexpected. If you think it a waste of time,
> why have you and Gary spent so much time responding so vigorously?
> All you had to do was not comment.
>
> In summary, the point was your reaction to the article, not the article
> itself.
>
> --
> Don Hills    (dmhills at attglobaldotnet)     Wellington, New Zealand
> "New interface closely resembles Presentation Manager,
> preparing you for the wonders of OS/2!"
>    -- Advertisement on the box for Microsoft Windows 2.11 for 286

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5