Hello Maurice.

15 Feb 05 09:19, you wrote to me:

 MK>>> seems to me that I am only seeing the tip of the iceberg and
 MK>>> that each so-called dupe I do see probably represents a small
 MK>>> fraction of what is really going on.  Does that make sense?

 RT>> Yes, it explains a whole heap better what you have been on about
 RT>> ....

 MK> Yeah, I am not hat anyone would call a "good communicator" when it
 MK> comes to these sorts of things.

For that matter, niether am I, so join the club ... 

 RT>> I usually don't check them all, but I have yet to notice a dupe,
 RT>> that I cannot find in the echo base where it should be, will
 RT>> check all dupes, next time I get a batch, even if there a 300+ of
 RT>> them. :-((

 MK> Really?  That many?  That is far too much waste of bandwidth for sure.

Last batch that came in about 3 weeks ago was 296 msgs. :-(

I agree a large waste of bandwidth ... :-(((

Russell

--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.4.7