From: black.hole.4.spam{at}gmail.com (Don Hills)

In article , "Mark"
 wrote:
>I find your explanation to be lacking and your conclusion that it would
>cause a "kneejerk" reaction to be specious. But do try again.
>
>Next time though, please try and have a position instead of wasting time
>with your lame games -- why on God's green Earth would anyone post anything
>if they "had no position to support?" you have no opinion on the subject why are you wasting our time posting lame
>urls without any desire to comment on one side or the other?>

I posted it because I knew Gary, at least, would bite like a hungry pike.
You were a bonus, though not unexpected. If you think it a waste of time,
why have you and Gary spent so much time responding so vigorously? All you
had to do was not comment.

In summary, the point was your reaction to the article, not the article itself.

--
Don Hills    (dmhills at attglobaldotnet)     Wellington, New Zealand
"New interface closely resembles Presentation Manager,
 preparing you for the wonders of OS/2!"
    -- Advertisement on the box for Microsoft Windows 2.11 for 286

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5