From: "Geo." 

"Adam" <""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the
field.near the bridge"> wrote in message
news:45f5c8e3{at}w3.nls.net...

> It was OK. What made me laugh was that they were doing exactly as they
> accused others of i.e having an agenda & seeking evidence for it.

Well naturally, it's propaganda. But I find several points they made quite
interesting. First was Al Gore's graphs showing temperature vs CO2 levels
over the past 100K years, co2 increase definitely follows the temperature
increase HOWEVER what they did not say was that co2 decrease also precedes
the temperature decrease. I thought that quite interesting.

Second was about the UN "scientists" being a bunch of political
bullshit where half the report was censured before it was released and how
they claimed 2100 scientists but a lot of those aren't scientists and
others were pissed that their names were put on the list since they didn't
even come close to agreeing with the report that was published.

The parts about the oceans releasing CO2 and how it's such a minute part of
the atmosphere that it can't account for the temperature change I already
knew.

Also the temperature decrease after WW2, that was interesting in that I
wonder how much dust and particulate matter was spewed into the air during
the war from things like bombings, fires, and rampant industrial processes
where nobody cared about pollution because they needed what was being
produced.

Geo.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5