Replying to a message of Bob Klahn to Bob Ackley:

 DD>>> No doubt. But, he ain't alone in that theory. Kids today don't seem
 DD>>> to class a hummer as "sex". In either direction.
So, what's your
 DD>>> point?

 BA>> Only that it's called 'oral sex' for a reason.  'Oral sex'
 BA>> is a subset of 'sex,'
 BA>> and it really doesn't matter what kids today, or the kids
 BA>> of 1995, think.

 BK>  Actually, it does matter. If you believe it to be true, you may
 BK>  be wrong, but it isn't a lie.

 BK>  In this case, I do believe you are wrong. Oral sex is not a
 BK>  subset of sex, but it is a subset of sex play. Sex is a
 BK>  biological function that, in the case of a fully functional
 BK>  pair, leads to pregnancy. If done at the right time... etc.

 BK>  Any other activity may be sex play, but it ain't sex.

I guess it's nice to know that if one wears a rubber or if she's on the pill
it isn't really sex, just 'sex play.'

--- FleetStreet 1.19+