Hello CNCabej,

I think you should keep on putting forth posts with a firm focus 
on your alluring (necessarily/realistically tenuous) proposition 
of an evolved, brain correlated, extension ('amplified reach') 
of 'phenotype fabricating' feedback loops.

(That is how I recall the essential content of some of your posts in the past.)

However, many evolutionary theorists' brains are already under threat 
of becoming overheated by the need to consider recently reinforced 
indications that 

1. "junk-DNA" might be worthy of being seen more like jewelry 
than as junk (or having not just a simple but a complex role, and 
being a seriously working investment in the business of building 
sophisticated brain-body systems), and 

2. that the seven or so histones (compared to the four amino acids of DNA)  
of chromatin (formerly mainly thought to be a mere packing-material for DNA) 
also lend and important by "imprinting" heritable hand to how we
become and be 
how we are. 

Or, as evidenced by certain debates here in s.b.e., 
many salaried-or-not students and professional-or-not "ponderers" 
of Evolution are getting left behind - being stuck on some conceptual confusion 
(and AEVASIVE preoccupation with) some "old hat"
evolution-theoretical triviality.

Peter
---
þ RIMEGate(tm)/RGXPost V1.14 at BBSWORLD * Info{at}bbsworld.com

---
 * RIMEGate(tm)V10.2áÿ* RelayNet(tm) NNTP Gateway * MoonDog BBS
 * RgateImp.MoonDog.BBS at 12/18/04 6:14:59 AM