| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: GA Amendment Recognizes `Human Being` from Moment of Fertilization |
From: firelock_ny{at}hotmail.com
On Mar 22, 7:15 pm, "John D.Wentzky"
wrote:
> wrote in message
>
> news:1174579792.210274.7470{at}l75g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 22, 8:47 am, "John D.Wentzky"
> > wrote:
> >> wrote in message
>
> >>news:1174543253.822848.309870{at}o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> > On Mar 22, 12:44 am, "J Young"
wrote:
> >> >> More and more each day, it appears the efforts of the pro-life
> >> >> movement
> >> >> are
> >> >> paying dividends.
>
> >> >>http://www.covenantnews.com/abortion/archives/028649.html
>
> >> >> In an apparent challenge to the Supreme Court
opinion Roe v. Wade, on
> >> >> March
> >> >> 20, 2007, Georgia lawmakers introduced the following
Resolution (HR
> >> >> 536)
> >> >> to
> >> >> amend the state Constitution: "A RESOLUTION
proposing an amendment to
> >> >> the
> >> >> Constitution so as to provide that the paramount
right to life is
> >> >> vested
> >> >> in
> >> >> each human being from the moment of fertilization
without regard to
> >> >> age,
> >> >> race, sex, health, function, or condition of
dependency; to provide
> >> >> for
> >> >> submission of this amendment for ratification or
rejection; and for
> >> >> other
> >> >> purposes."
>
> >> > I doubt this one will fly, or if it does, stand, but...
> >> >From this amendment's ratification onwards, every
> >> > miscarriage in Georgia will require a police investigation.
>
> >> No it won't, you idiot.
>
> >> > And miscarriage is a *very* common outcome of
> >> > pregnancy,
>
> >> Which should tell you that the state has no right to violate
the privacy
> >> rights of individuals.
>
> >> > often before the mother is even aware
> >> > that she's pregnant.
>
> >> So, idiot, how you going to detect such miscarriages, state control
> >> freak?
>
> > Since you've completely missed my point, let me
> > put this in terms that you're better able to
> > understand: I know you are, but what am I?
>
> Did you mean that you think the State would want to investigate every
> miscarriage when they don't even know if a miscarriage occured?
If they've defined those tiny dots of cells as people, then they've bound
themselves to do so. The fact that doing so is nearly impossible doesn't
change this.
--
Walt Smith
Firelock on DALNet
--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag
* Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)SEEN-BY: 633/267 5030/786 @PATH: 261/38 123/500 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.