Jim McGinn wrote:
> Anon. wrote:
> 
>>Jim McGinn wrote:
>>
>>>Anon. wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>I've no idea what Jim is trying to achieve
>>>>here:
>>>
>>>
>>>This is what I was trying to achieve:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>. . . using relatedness to measure the degree
>>>>to which the phenotype of one individual can
>>>>be predicted from that in another, . . .
>>>
>>>
>>>You just blew it, Bob.  It's plainly demonstrable
>>>(provable) that relatedness does not measure the
>>>degree to which the phenotype of one individual
>>>can be predicted from that in another.
>>
>>Yes.  That was my point.
> 
> 
> So you're saying it was your intention to be wrong?
> 
I can only conclude from this that you haven't undestood what I wrote: I 
have never claimed that relatedness measures phenotypic similarity.

As you're not providing any arguments when we disagree, but only 
statements that other people than you have got things wrong, there's no 
point in continuing this thread - it's not gonig to get us anywhere.

Bob

-- 
Bob O'Hara
Department of Mathematics and Statistics
P.O. Box 68 (Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2b)
FIN-00014 University of Helsinki
Finland

Telephone: +358-9-191 51479
Mobile: +358 50 599 0540
Fax:  +358-9-191 51400
WWW:  http://www.RNI.Helsinki.FI/~boh/
Journal of Negative Results - EEB: www.jnr-eeb.org
---
ž RIMEGate(tm)/RGXPost V1.14 at BBSWORLD * Info{at}bbsworld.com

---
 * RIMEGate(tm)V10.2į’* RelayNet(tm) NNTP Gateway * MoonDog BBS
 * RgateImp.MoonDog.BBS at 12/15/04 5:36:08 PM