RS>> He beat their best, not once, but TWICE!
 FS>
 FS>> Actually Bill Clinton didn't even *face* the best the Republicans
 FS>> had to offer.  Why not?  Because a constitutional amendment
 FS>> prevented the GREAT Ronald Reagan from being easily elected to a
 FS>> third term ... [sigh] ...

 DC>> It also prevented Clinton from running, too.

 DC>> It would have been interesting!

 FS> Actually I think Bill Clinton, if he had been able to run for
 FS> a third term would have beaten George W. Bush easily ... and
 FS> that doesn't say much for the American voter ... [sigh] ...

are you folk forgetting that the number of terms is not limited? it is the
number of back-to-back terms that is limited...

the president can be elected for two four year terms and then has to sit
out at least one four year term and can then be elected for another set of
two four year terms, and so on...

)\/(ark