From: John Cuccia 

On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 10:09:01 -0400, "Geo"  wrote:

>"John Cuccia"  wrote in message
>news:d2seg1d8632g9993gkhjkv1f9rmprkc7pt{at}4ax.com...
>
>> >But more importantly, the fact that you consider it impossible by
>definition
>> >means you agree that evolution has a direction.
>>
>> I consider it impossible by the definition you proposed above.  I
>> don't think that devolution happens, only evolution.
>
>Ok, I'm game, can you define evolution in a way that makes devolution
>possible?

I don't think the word "devolution" has any meaning; that is,
it's a nonsense word, something we made up for sake of argument.

With respect to evolution, there are only viable and non-viable mutations.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5